Abstract
The aim of this study is to ascertain
through a simulation process how low and even negative interest rates affect the
performance of different portfolio insurance (PI) methodologies and which
concepts are successful in different assumed scenarios. In the past, many
papers have been published providing empirical evidence on the benefits of PI
strategies in different markets. However, hardly any paper focuses on the
impact of low interest rates on the performance of PI strategies although
interest rates are currently at an all-time low throughout the OECD. In this
paper we run Monte Carlo simulations for the buy-and-hold (B&H), Constant
Mix, Stop Loss, Constant Proportion Portfolio Insurance (CPPI), and Time
Invariant Portfolio Protection (TIPP) strategies. We show that lower interest
rates have an impact on the ranking of these strategies according to different
performance measures such as Sharpe Ratio, Treynor Ratio, Sortino Ratio, or Lower
Partial Moment (LPM) performance measures. B&H and Constant Mix perform relatively well in respect of the
Sharpe and Treynor Ratio. However, when considering the Sortino Ratio or
LPM performance measures these concepts are particularly badly affected by the reduction in interest
rates, especially when it comes to negative rates. Here, the strength of the
CPPI strategy becomes obvious.