Abstract
Using
data collected from a leading P2P platform in China, this paper empirically
tests the discrimination of investors on the occupational identity of borrowers
in online lending. I find that P2P investors discriminate against borrowers who
are salary earners in terms of occupational identity while preferring borrowers
who are private entrepreneurs. Moreover, this kind of discrimination can be
found in borrowers both with high credit ratings and low credit ratings. The
findings also imply that the occupational identity of borrowers plays a role of
moderating the relationship between the credit rating and the probability of
successful funding. Compared with private entrepreneurs, credit rating has a
weaker effect on the probability of successful funding among salary earners.
However, after examining the default rate, the results show that the default
rate of private entrepreneurs is significantly higher than that of salary
earners. This indicates that the discrimination of P2P investors is not based
on some rational economic roots and is a kind of inefficient tasted-based
discrimination.
JEL classification numbers: H 74, J 71
Keywords: occupational identity,
peer-to-peer lending, probability of successful funding, borrowing cost,
discrimination