Abstract
The stability of any economy is closely
tied to the stability of its banking sector, necessitating continuous
evaluation and efficiency enhancement. The recent emergence of Interest-free
banking in the MENA region and globally has seen rapid growth, attracting
global interest. However, limited research has compared the financial
performance of this new type of banking with conventional banks, particularly
in the MENA region. To address this gap, this study aims to measure and compare
the financial performance of 55 conventional banks and 26 interest-free banks
across the MENA region from 2008 to 2014, using the CAMELS rating system.
Descriptive statistics will be employed to analyze time series data, followed
by the One-Way ANOVA analysis to identify significant differences between the
two banking systems. Pearson’s correlation coefficient will be used to assess
correlations among independent variables and test for multi-collinearity
problems. Ultimately, the fixed-effects model will determine how internal factors
like capital adequacy, asset quality, management quality, earnings quality, and
liquidity impact the financial performance of both banking system types in the
MENA region. The study's findings reveal that asset quality, earnings quality,
and liquidity are the key drivers of profitability for both interest-free and
conventional banks in the MENA region.
Keywords: Interest-free banking, Conventional banking, CAMELS rating
system, MENA Region, Financial institutions, Financial intermediaries, Financial
crisis.