Abstract
This paper analyses the differences
between local and commercial banks, focusing on credit supply in the aftermath
of a natural disaster. Using the Italian earthquake of 2012 as exogenous shock,
we investigate whether distinct banking models react differently. The baseline
estimation is based on diff-in-diff approach. We show that Cooperative Banks,
differently from commercial banks, do not interrupt the credit channel. To
corroborate these findings, we also employ panel estimation, incorporating
additional explanatory variables. The results are consistent with the baseline,
indicating that local banks increased credit supply (recovery lending) in the
territories affected by the earthquake, whereas there is no evidence for
commercial banks. A series of robustness checks is carried out to bolster the
results. Firstly, the sample size is enlarged by including a wider set of
municipalities. Secondly, a placebo test is conducted by falsifying the date of
the event and a propensity score matching analysis is performed on a control
group. Finally, the same analysis is repeated on a random sample of
municipalities. The robustness checks provide support to the baseline
estimation. In municipalities affected by the earthquake, Cooperative Banks
tend to increase loan supply, aiding the economic recovery. This does not
emerge for other banks.
JEL classification numbers: G01, G210, G28.
Keywords: Cooperative Credit Banks, Bank Lending, Financial Systems,
Economic Cycles.