Abstract
The study explores the
correlation between the immediate and the longer-term stock returns following
analyst recommendation revisions. In line
with previous studies, documenting that recommendation revisions are followed
by significant stock price drifts , I suggest that if a recommendation revision is followed by a
relatively large short-term stock price drift, then it may indicate that the
new information is more completely reflected by the respective stock's price, creating
significantly less reasons for subsequent longer-term price drift, which
therefore, should be significantly less pronounced compared to the one
following another recommendation revision which is not immediately followed by
a significant price drift in a short run. Employing
a sample of recommendation revisions, I establish that positive
(negative) one-, three- and six-month stock price drifts after recommendation
upgrades (downgrades) are significantly more pronounced if the latter are
immediately followed by relatively low (high) short-term (5- or 10-day)
cumulative abnormal returns. The effect remains
robust after accounting for additional company-specific (size, Market-Model
beta, historical volatility) and event-specific (number of recommendation
categories changed in the revision, analyst experience) factors.