Abstract
Traditional econometric modelling typically follows
the idea that market returns follow a normal distribution. However, the concept
of tail risk indicates that the distribution of returns is not normal, but
skewed and has heavy tails. Thus, a heavy-tailed distribution, which accurately
estimates the tail risk, would significantly improve quantitative risk
management practice. In this paper, we compare four widely used heavy-tailed
distributions using the S&P 500 daily returns. Our results indicate that
the Skewed t distribution in Hansen
(1994) has the superior empirical performance compared with the Student’s t distribution, the normal reciprocal
inverse Gaussian distribution and the generalized hyperbolic distribution. We
further showed the Skewed t distribution
could generate the VaR estimates closest to the nonparametric historical VaR
estimates compared with other heavy-tailed distributions.