Abstract
This paper analyses the
impact of different forms of financial participation on residents'
entrepreneurial choices by defining different forms of lending based on CHFS
2019 data. The study finds that: (1) Both single and
compound forms of participation can have a significant positive impact on
residents' entrepreneurial choices, with the compound form of participation
having a relatively higher boosting effect than the single form of
participation; (2) Among the single forms of participation, internet loans have the smallest promotion effect, indicating that
the role of digital finance is still to be explored, while private loans have
the largest promotion effect; (3) Among the composite forms of participation,
the form without bank loans has the lowest facilitation effect, indicating that
bank loans are highly important for residents' choice of entrepreneurship; (4)
Heterogeneity analysis reveals that financial services participation has a more
significant contribution to entrepreneurial activity among low endowment
households, both in single and composite forms of participation. This paper argues that the supporting role of formal finance should
be strengthened, the development of informal finance should be reasonably
guided, and the financial literacy of households should be further enhanced to
bring into play the inclusive role of digital finance.
JEL classification numbers: H20, H30, H81.
Keywords: Digitization of
financial institutions; Financial services
participation; Digital finance; Internet lending; Entrepreneurial activity.