Abstract
Based on 8,666 invalidation reexamined China invention grant
patents of decision dates from 2000 to 2021, the effect and value of eight
indicators for classifying strong and weak patents in nine technology areas,
including overall technology and eight technology sections, was thoroughly
analyzed via ANOVA. Two high valuable indicators including abstract word count
and examination duration for classification were found, which respectively
showed significance in five technology areas. Four less valuable indicators,
including claim count, figure count, inventor count and IPC count, were found
to respectively show significance in one or two technology areas. A valueless
indicator of applicant count was found to show none of significance in any
technology areas. The strong patents did not always show higher indicator means
of significance. Especially for the high valuable indicator of examination
duration, the strong patents showed lower means in any of five technology areas
of significance. The finding of this research would contribute the state of art
in evaluating patents and help patent owners improve their patent asset
management strategy.
JEL classification numbers: C38, C46, G11, G12.