[ Download ]
Abstract
Driven by the transition pressures from
downstream end-users, manufacturing waste management has emerged as an
existential issue for corporations. Primarily, regulatory baselines must not be
breached, as facing punitive fines or operational halts imposes catastrophic
impacts on businesses. Moreover, the extent to which circular economy practices
are integrated critically affects the enterprise, directly dictating waste
disposal expenditures and the profit margins of resource recovery.
However, within a certain export-oriented
island economy in East Asia, a series of paradoxical dynamics generates severe
operational strains for enterprises. While one would theoretically expect an
export-reliant economy to cultivate a highly business-friendly environment, the
reality is quite the opposite. Grassroots environmental organizations, emerging
in tandem with the region's democratization, have weaponized the Environmental
Impact Assessment framework and referendum mobilizations to establish themselves
as a pivotal third-party force, profoundly dictating the political and economic
trajectory of the economy.
Employing an outcomes-based analytical
lens, this research deconstructs the Potemkin Village model of public
governance in this economy—a systemic façade collaboratively erected by
executive authorities and legislative bodies under the intense pressure of
grassroots environmental advocacy and electoral politics.
This study concludes that the façade of
superficial compliance—erected upon the foundations of electoral politics and
draconian penalization—drastically escalates the transaction costs for
commercial activities, ultimately undermining the sustainable economic
development of the region.
JEL classification numbers: D20, D70, P35.
Keywords: Potemkin Village, Transaction Costs, Strict Liability.