Abstract
To understand the genesis of trade is necessary to go
back to the XIV and XV centuries to know that it is in Italy where accelerated
development of merchant capital is observing. The fast trade between cities
such as Milan, Genova and Florence results in economic conditions of trade that
began to spread to other cities like Bremen, Hamburg and Lubeck in the Baltic
region, which led to the rise of capitalism. So, we cannot think in capitalism
without thinking in trade. Later, with the great discovers of the period, in
the XVI century, Spain becomes a world power by its conquests in America
(Mexico and Peru) and in Europe (Belgium, Netherlands, much of Italy, among
other countries). However, by the XVIII century, Holland was the model of
capitalist nation. It´s in those centuries that the economic doctrine of
mercantilism emerges based on historical and economic aspects that characterize
the fall of feudalism, promoting foreign trade, (sell more and buy less). This
doctrine (practice) comes together with a nationalist stance in a protectionist
direction of its own interests based on wealth generation. This contradiction
is still observing today with the domestic markets protectionism, relocating
the investment and provoking the argue of diversification: The nowadays main
challenge for APEC. At the same time APEC has to take into account that, far
from encouraging a free global trade, free trade agreements promote
protectionism. Therefore, negotiations as the Trans-Pacific Partnership
Agreement (TPP) and a possible Free Trade Area of Asia-Pacific (FTAAP), aim at
the protection of a regional space that is opposed to free trade that is
supported economically by the classical theory. Trade agreements promotes trade
liberalization among its members, but with restrictions for the externals,
limiting this way free trade and current philosophy of capitalism and
globalization itself. We find that current trading conditions are based on
economic activities at four or five centuries ago, when trade comes to its
final stage of feudalism to become the dominant category of capitalist mode of
production, in what there is a sort of perverse association between
protectionism and free trade. Nowadays Mexico is suffering some investment
relocation and facing up the idea of trade diversification as component for its
own economic development taking into account exports growing up to the APEC
region, where are located the most important economies of XXI century.
JEL classification numbers: D24, O47, O50
Keywords:
Investment; relocation; APEC; Mexico